Problem
There is a slightly annoying problem with this method: If the derivative is undefined at a point then the graph won't display a vertical tangent; it just won't draw a line at all here.Solution
I recently found a way to test for undefinedness in Desmos. The expression {k = k: 0, 1} will return 1 if k is undefined (or 0 if it's defined). So we can use this technique to graph a separate vertical line at x = a when the value of f'(a) is undefined.Note that if the gradient is defined, I actually don't want this line to appear at all, which is why I threw in an undefined value (if I just put 0 here then it would graph x = 0 for these values of a).
I am much happier with this version of the graph.
[Update] Minor Technical Problem: Undefined function values
After posting this, I realised that the additional rule will also graph a vertical line when the function itself is undefined at a point. I'm not sure what the best behaviour is for this case, but perhaps it would be nice to have a draggable point along the x-axis with no vertical line.To implement this, change line 2 from (a, f(a)) to a more complicated conditional
No comments:
Post a Comment